Twitter founder Jack Dorsey. Card swipe on iPhone.
Roberto Garavaglia was nice enough to share this finextra story on linkedin. Is this a consumer play.. or a “merchant play”? Will I see my local ticket scalpers taking credit cards on their iPhone? This start up was certainly “in the black”. Data we know:
- Squirrel has a “signature” line in the app
- Have hardware on the phone
- Alpha test in NYC
- Receipt in engadget pic above shows consumer payment (you paid)
- Mind behind it is Dorsey
- Top VCs know about it, and seem to think it is a merchant play.
- Very US centric.. no EMV (Chip and Pin)
There are certainly some conflicting data points. If a consumer play.. this signature will not be valid… and transaction will be treated as a CNP (so why the signature?). If this is a merchant play who would possibly want to act as acquirer (fraud loss)? The merchant use would make most fraud heads loose a little sleep, for they would have a whole new threat vector. Can you imagine the buyers of the merchant use?.. The bank and I will have to worry about every kid in a fast food window and every waitress holding my card swiping on their iPhone (in addition to paying for my dinner). My guess is that squirrel has the technology working.. but haven’t figured out the “banking side”.
Fraud attacks the “weakest link” in payments quickly. Would love to hear from others on the community, but my view is:
- Interesting as a merchant play…. but acquirers will shy away from originating transaction in either network without solid fraud controls. The merchant owns the loss here by rules of network in a “CNP transaction”. Signature capability will be debated…
- Squirrel biz model.. questionable as anything but a hardware business. The fraud numbers of leading merchant selling digital goods is astounding. All top merchants have had to develop their own internal specialist teams to handle. If Apple and PayPal have trouble with teams of 300+ (after 10 years) this will be a challenge for any new “merchant”. As a payment method, squirrel will have to take this on. Having access to the physical card may allow them to try something disruptive like MagTek which reads the randomness (noise) in the card stripe to establish a “unique” card… which has the downside of card registration. Something like this would push squirrel further into a “US centric” model as it appears that they do not support EMV (aka Chip and PIN).
- “No go” as a consumer play. Why not just keep my card at the Apple app store? or at PayPal? What is the incremental value that this provides me? Why not just key in my card data.. why add a reader to my sexy iPhone .. .in its sexy case.
Innovation in payments is tough… if I were going to add something the Steve Job’s product plan for the iPhone what would it be?
- Unique to every person
- Globally Accepted for use in Payment and Authentication, by merchants, banks, networks, regulators
- Low error rate
- Impossible to clone
- Difficult to crack
The answer is… ( ). OK so nothing fits my criteria, but any appendage on my iPhone must certainly seek to optimize the goals above. Only item I’ve seen that comes close it IRIS scanning.. now being miniaturized to fit on a chip the size of your thumbnail (below). Just for fun.. I bought “paybyiris.com” domain as I finished this article (today).
Pingback: SquareUp – Updated from Previous Post « New Ventures in Financial Services
Pingback: $5B MNO Opportunity: KYC « New Ventures in Financial Services
Pingback: Apple’s Commerce Future = Square? « FinVentures